Duff photographer
Active member
You do realise that entire photo books have been dedicated to doors. Seems to be an entire photographic genre all of its own.
So no, apparently not boring.
Cheers,
Duff.
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
You do realise that entire photo books have been dedicated to doors. Seems to be an entire photographic genre all of its own.
Yes I know, however with those books the appreciation is often more with "who made the photos" rather than "what can we see on the photos"You do realise that entire photo books have been dedicated to doors. Seems to be an entire photographic genre all of its own.
So no, apparently not boring.
Ah yes, indeed. It reminds me of the doting parents praising their child for the terrible drawing of a house they made, while grimacing at the drawings the other children have made. I use it as a good-mannered "put down" on some well known photographers.Yes I know, however with those books the appreciation is often more with "who made the photos" rather than "what can we see on the photos"
Mono is fine of course, but colour can also have its place where the colour palette is limited, as in your pic, adding to that minimalist effect again (as I mentioned with Pieter's pic). Maybe a little more editing work would bring that out more?@pegelli, gotta give it to you. The doors qualify in this thread. Well shot.
Here's some vines shot with my A7R2. I have an even sleepier one in which blowing snow makes the vines hard to see. Yes, this photo is unlikely to interest anyone, but I shot the same vines later, stitched, edited and converted to mono. For some reason, stitching, removing color, and tweaking a bit made these vines into a photo I liked. Showed me that photographic technique has the power to create interest in what otherwise can be boring.
View attachment 210320
The really boring (cliché) thing to do would be to have one half-filled
You must throw some wicked parties.
What makes this topic so difficult is that, for a photo to be worthy, it has have been taken without boring intent. Sure, I can take a shot of my shoe, but that doesn't qualify here because it never had a chance to be anything but boring. In contrast, I think a lot of us have taken many shots (like my first vines example) that seemed like a good idea at the time, but which turned out to be uninteresting - even to us, We tend to delete those so they can be hard to raise up when we want them for a weird thread.Mono is fine of course, but colour can also have its place where the colour palette is limited, as in your pic, adding to that minimalist effect again (as I mentioned with Pieter's pic). Maybe a little more editing work would bring that out more?
if I apply the logic I use in my previous post, only you know if it is boring. If it demonstrates some knowledge or skill that is an advance over what you previously had, then it is interesting for that reason - your artistic evolution interests anyone who is also trying to evolve. If it is similar to everything else you do, then it is in your style and it becomes a subjective question of whether that is interesting. So, is this boring?I'm not sure about this version. I do like subtle and understated monochrome prints, but I haven't decided yet if this one falls into the "boring" category. Any thoughts?
Thanks for your post! After processing the color image to monochrome a few other ways, I decided that the version I posted here was actually my favorite. I did create a few that were boring to me, so I am printing this image now on the Red River Aurora Art White fine art matte paper for the print exchange.if I apply the logic I use in my previous post, only you know if it is boring. If it demonstrates some knowledge or skill that is an advance over what you previously had, then it is interesting for that reason - your artistic evolution interests anyone who is also trying to evolve. If it is similar to everything else you do, then it is in your style and it becomes a subjective question of whether that is interesting. So, is this boring?